Trump Admin Seeks to Replace Tariffs   03/12 06:27

   The Trump administration on Wednesday opened a new trade investigation into 
manufacturing in foreign countries -- an effort that comes after the Supreme 
Court struck down President Donald Trump's previous use of tariffs by declaring 
an economic emergency.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Trump administration on Wednesday opened a new trade 
investigation into manufacturing in foreign countries -- an effort that comes 
after the Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump's previous use of 
tariffs by declaring an economic emergency.

   Trump and his team have made clear that they're seeking to replace the 
hundreds of billions of dollars in lost revenues after the Supreme Court's 
February ruling by using different laws to establish new tariffs.

   In this case, the administration is starting investigations under Section 
301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which could eventually lead to new import taxes. 
But U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, in a Wednesday call with 
reporters, said he didn't want to prejudge the outcome of the process.

   "The policy remains the same -- the tools may change depending on, you know, 
the vagaries of courts and other things," said Greer, stressing that the goal 
was to protect American jobs.

   The start of the process to fully replace Trump's prior tariffs could invite 
a return of much of the drama that rattled the global economy last year. The 
since-overturned tariffs led to new frameworks with U.S. trade partners -- and 
it's unclear what impact a new set of import taxes could have on those 
agreements. Greer described the trade frameworks as standing on their own and 
suggested they were separate from the new investigation.

   This new set of tariffs could play out against the backdrop of a war in Iran 
and midterm elections in which Democrats are running against Trump's Republican 
allies by emphasizing that the public is owed tariff refunds following the 
Supreme Court decision.

   Greer said that the investigation would examine excess industrial capacity 
and government backing that could give foreign companies an unfair advantage 
over U.S. companies.

   The entities subject to the investigation include China, the European Union, 
Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Indonesia, Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, South 
Korea, Vietnam, the self-governing island of Taiwan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Japan 
and India. The government is looking for what it deems to be persistent trade 
surpluses with the U.S. and policies such as subsidies and the suppression of 
workers' wages, among other factors.

   The administration is also rolling out a Section 301 investigation to ban 
the importing of goods made by forced labor.

   Greer indicated that there could be additional Section 301 investigations 
over issues such as digital service taxes, pharmaceutical drug pricing and 
ocean pollution, among other possibilities. The Commerce Department has 
separate trade investigations under Section 232 of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act.

   There are timeline pressures for the administration to complete its 
investigations. The administration has imposed 10% tariffs on foreign-made 
goods under section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, but those expire after 150 days 
on July 24. Trump said he planned to raise that import tax to 15%, but he has 
yet to do so.

   Greer said the administration is "keying off" the new investigation based on 
the 150-day deadline, saying that the goal is to bring "potential options" to 
Trump as soon as possible.

   Greer said the investigations would be separate from the trade frameworks 
announced last year by Trump that set baseline tariff rates, which led to 15% 
rates charged on goods from the European Union, Japan and South Korea, among 
other places, that have since been overturned by the Supreme Court. Still, he 
suggested that the frameworks could play a factor.

   "My sense is that these countries continue to want to deal, and President 
Trump continues to want the deal," Greer said, adding that since tariffs are in 
play the commitments that the countries have made and the implementation of the 
frameworks would be considered as they "bump" against the demands of the 
Section 301 process.